Agentic AI

Agentic AI is AI that can work towards a goal by planning steps, using tools and taking actions in other systems, such as looking up an account, logging a job or sending an update, rather than only generating a response to a single prompt.

What is agentic AI?

Agentic AI describes AI systems that act, not just respond. A standard generative AI model takes a prompt and produces an answer. An agentic system is given a goal, works out the steps needed, uses tools to carry them out, checks the results and adjusts until the goal is met or it needs help.

The “tools” are usually connections to other systems: a CRM, billing platform, outage management system, booking calendar or messaging service. The AI decides which to use and when, within whatever limits it has been given.

The term is relatively new and is used loosely. Some products labelled agentic are conventional automation with a language model on top. The useful question is what the system can actually do on its own, and under what controls.

How agentic AI works

A typical agentic loop looks like this:

  1. Understand the goal. For example, “the customer wants to report a fault and know when it will be fixed”.
  2. Plan. Identify the steps: confirm the address, check for a known outage, log a new job if there isn’t one, give the latest information.
  3. Act. Call the relevant systems in turn.
  4. Check. Look at what came back. Did the job log successfully? Is the outage information current?
  5. Respond or escalate. Tell the customer the outcome, or hand over to a person if something is outside its limits.

Where it fits in a contact centre

Agentic AI extends what conversational AI can resolve. Instead of telling a customer how to do something, it can do it for them. Typical candidates include:

  • Logging faults and service requests in back-end systems.
  • Updating contact details or preferences.
  • Booking, changing or confirming appointments.
  • Checking status across several systems and giving one joined-up answer.
  • Behind the scenes, triaging and routing work, or preparing a case before an agent picks it up.

The best candidates are tasks that are high volume, rule-based and low risk if something goes slightly wrong.

The risks to manage

Giving AI the ability to act raises the stakes of mistakes. A wrong answer is a problem; a wrong action, such as a job raised against the wrong address or a change made to the wrong account, can be harder to undo. Key controls include:

  • Least privilege. Give the AI access only to the actions it genuinely needs.
  • Confirmation steps. Read key details back to the customer before acting on them.
  • Limits on high-stakes actions. Refunds, credit decisions, disconnections and anything affecting a vulnerable customer should involve a person.
  • Full logging. Every step should be recorded and auditable.
  • Clear escalation. A fast AI-to-human handover when the AI is unsure or the task is outside its scope.

These are all forms of AI guardrails, and they matter more for agentic AI than for any other kind.

A realistic view

Agentic AI is moving quickly, and it will take on more routine work in contact centres over the coming years. The organisations that benefit most will start with narrow, well-defined tasks, prove them on real customers, and expand step by step, keeping people accountable for the outcomes throughout.

How Telnet Helps

Where Telnet comes in

Telnet’s AI already does practical, action-taking work on live customer contact, within clear limits:

  • Tulip doesn’t just talk. It logs fault and service requests straight into your systems with the details captured properly, so the job is raised without an agent transcribing it afterwards.
  • Iris routes and prioritises work by content, decides whether a new email should reopen a closed case, and writes up outcomes into structured fields.

What we don’t do is let AI loose on the conversations where a customer needs a human. Each capability is configured around your process and your rules for when a person takes over, and there is an onshore team in New Zealand and Australia behind it. That is the right balance for agentic AI today: let it take the routine actions that slow people down, and keep people in charge of judgement.

FAQ

Agentic AI FAQs

How is agentic AI different from a chatbot?

A traditional chatbot answers questions within a conversation. An agentic system is given a goal and can work out the steps, call other systems, check the results and carry on until the task is done. In a contact centre, that might mean confirming a customer’s identity, checking an outage system, logging a fault and sending a confirmation, all in one interaction.

Is agentic AI safe to use with customers?

It can be, with the right limits. The risk grows with what the AI is allowed to do: reading information is low risk, while changing accounts, issuing refunds or making commitments is higher. Sensible deployments restrict actions, require confirmation for anything significant, log every step and hand over to a person when the situation calls for judgement.

Will agentic AI replace contact centre agents?

It will change some work, particularly routine tasks that follow clear rules. It isn’t a substitute for people in complex, emotional or high-stakes conversations, and it still needs people to design, monitor and correct it. The likely outcome for most contact centres is AI handling more routine actions, with agents focused on the contacts that need them.

Ready to scale?

Outsourced contact centre
for New Zealand & Australia.

30+ years. 100% onshore. The leading provider to the energy & utilities industry.

Get in Touch